🔗 Share this article

Protesters gathered outside the legislative building this week

The Baltic nation's parliament members have voted to withdraw from an international accord designed to protect women from abuse, including family violence, following extensive and heated discussions in the parliament.

Thousands of demonstrators assembled in Riga this past week to voice disagreement with the decision. The final authority now lies with President Edgars Rinkevics, who must decide whether to approve or reject the legislation.

Known as the European treaty, the 2011 agreement only became active in the Baltic state last twelve months ago, mandating governments to establish laws and assistance programs to end all forms of abuse.

The Baltic nation has become the first European Union member to begin the process of exiting from the treaty. Turkey pulled out in 2021, a move that rights groups characterized as a significant regression for women's rights.

Ideological Debate and Resistance

The international agreement was approved by the European Union in 2023, yet traditionalist factions have argued that its emphasis on gender equality undermines family values and promotes what they term "gender ideology".

Following a lengthy discussion in the Saeima, MPs voted 56 to 32 to withdraw from the treaty, a move sponsored by opposition parties but supported by representatives from one of the three governing partners.

The result represents a setback for moderate conservative government leader the nation's PM, who stood with protesters outside parliament earlier this week. "We refuse to give up, we will persist in our struggle so that violence will not prevail," she stated to the crowd.

Political Disagreements and Responses

One of the primary political groups supporting the withdrawal is a nationalist party, whose leader has urged the public to choose between what he terms a "natural family" and "non-binary concepts with various gender identities".

The nation's ombudswoman Karina Palkova urged the treaty not to be made political, while the group the rights organization stated it was "not a threat to national principles, it was an instrument to achieve them".

The recent decision has provoked widespread protest both inside the country and abroad.

22,000 individuals have endorsed a Latvian petition demanding the treaty to be preserved. The women's rights organization the rights center has announced a demonstration for next Thursday, accusing lawmakers of disregarding the wishes of the nation's citizens.

Global Concerns and Potential Next Steps

The leader of the European organization's legislative body commented that the Baltic state had made a rash choice driven by false information. He described it as an "unprecedented and deeply concerning regression for female equality and human rights in Europe".

He noted that since the transcontinental nation left the convention four years ago, instances of gender-based killings and abuse targeting females had increased significantly.

Because the vote did not secure a supermajority majority, the head of state could possibly send back the bill for additional review if he holds concerns.

Head of State the national leader announced on social media that he would assess the decision according to constitutional principles, "taking into account governmental and judicial considerations, rather than ideological or political perspectives".

Recently, another member of the ruling coalition, the reformist party, suggested it would not exclude petitioning to the supreme judicial body.

"This vote represents a concerning development for gender equality not only in Latvia but across the continent," commented a human rights advocate.

• Domestic abuse statistics have been increasing in several EU countries
• The Istanbul Convention requires particular legal protections for survivors of gender-based violence
• Latvia's decision could influence similar debates in other member states